OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Google: Gemma 4 31B

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Google: Gemma 4 31B: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway
Onebase URL to migrate
100sof models and routes
0prompt or output logs. Always.
Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.
Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.
Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Google: Gemma 4 31B has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Google: Gemma 4 31B has more provider fallback routes, while Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show Google: Gemma 4 31B with the lower p50 TTFT.

$1.84625/1MGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite cheapest route
$0.4642/1MGoogle: Gemma 4 31B cheapest route
1524 msGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite fastest measured p50 TTFT via google-vertex
1496 msGoogle: Gemma 4 31B fastest measured p50 TTFT via wandb

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteGoogle: Gemma 4 31B
Model idgoogle/gemini-3.1-flash-litegoogle/gemma-4-31b-it
Context1,048,576 tokens262,144 tokens
Credits provider routes411
Cheapest route$1.84625/1M$0.4642/1M
Cached input$0.026375/1M$0.03798/1M to $0.1477/1M
Privacy posturehas ZDR routehas provider E2EE route
Fastest measured p50 TTFT1524 ms via google-vertex1496 ms via wandb
Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data
Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%
Modes chat chat

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite routes

Google: Gemma 4 31B routes

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison
Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython
client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Google: Gemma 4 31B?

Google: Gemma 4 31B has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Google: Gemma 4 31B has more provider fallback routes, while Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show Google: Gemma 4 31B with the lower p50 TTFT.

Is Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Google: Gemma 4 31B cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $1.84625/1M for Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and $0.4642/1M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Google: Gemma 4 31B faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1524 ms for Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and 1496 ms for Google: Gemma 4 31B. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Google: Gemma 4 31B with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite and google/gemma-4-31b-it. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.

Workspace access

Sign in

Choose a sign in method to access your TrustedRouter workspace.

By signing in you agree to the terms of service and privacy policy.