OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

Claude Opus 4.6 AWS vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2

Claude Opus 4.6 AWS vs DeepSeek V3.2: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 has more provider fallback routes, while Claude Opus 4.6 AWS has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

$31.5/1MClaude Opus 4.6 AWS cheapest route

$0.672/1MDeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 cheapest route

not enough dataClaude Opus 4.6 AWS fastest measured p50 TTFT

2279 msDeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 fastest measured p50 TTFT via chutes

Claude Opus 4.6 AWSDeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2

Model idanthropic/claude-opus-4.6-awsdeepseek/deepseek-v3.2

Publisher Anthropic DeepSeek

AI IQ — IQ 103#57

Context1,000,000 tokens163,840 tokens

Provider routes017

Cheapest route$31.5/1M$0.672/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas confidential-compute route

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data2279 ms via chutes

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime rangenot enough data100.00%

Modes chat messages chat

Claude Opus 4.6 AWS routes

Overview0 endpoints

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 routes

Overview17 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.264 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K350 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.647 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 042346 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro44 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b43 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B41 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.141 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="anthropic/claude-opus-4.6-aws",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Claude Opus 4.6 AWS or DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2?

Is Claude Opus 4.6 AWS or DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $31.5/1M for Claude Opus 4.6 AWS and $0.672/1M for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Claude Opus 4.6 AWS or DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for Claude Opus 4.6 AWS and 2279 ms for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Claude Opus 4.6 AWS and DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between anthropic/claude-opus-4.6-aws and deepseek/deepseek-v3.2. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.