OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

Lucy Image 2 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2

Lucy Image 2 vs DeepSeek V3.2: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Lucy Image 2 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 has more provider fallback routes, while DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

selected routeLucy Image 2 cheapest route

$0.6752/1MDeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 cheapest route

not enough dataLucy Image 2 fastest measured p50 TTFT

1471 msDeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 fastest measured p50 TTFT via digitalocean

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Lucy Image 2DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2

Model iddecart/lucy-image-2deepseek/deepseek-v3.2

Publisher Decart DeepSeek

AI IQ — IQ 103#66

Context0 tokens163,840 tokens

Provider routes119

Cheapest routeselected route$0.6752/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas provider E2EE route

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data1471 ms via digitalocean

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime rangenot enough data85.71% to 100.00%

Modes chat

Lucy Image 2 routes

Overview1 endpoints

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 routes

Overview19 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.271 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K356 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 073152 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.650 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b50 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 042348 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 042347 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B46 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="decart/lucy-image-2",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Lucy Image 2 or DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2?

Is Lucy Image 2 or DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is selected route for Lucy Image 2 and $0.6752/1M for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Lucy Image 2 or DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for Lucy Image 2 and 1471 ms for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Lucy Image 2 and DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between decart/lucy-image-2 and deepseek/deepseek-v3.2. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.