OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs LGAI-EXAONE/K-EXAONE-2.0-750B-A37B

DeepSeek V3.2 vs LGAI-EXAONE/K-EXAONE-2.0-750B-A37B: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 has more provider fallback routes, while LGAI-EXAONE/K-EXAONE-2.0-750B-A37B has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show LGAI-EXAONE/K-EXAONE-2.0-750B-A37B with the lower p50 TTFT.

$0.672/1MDeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 cheapest route

$3.15/1MLGAI-EXAONE/K-EXAONE-2.0-750B-A37B cheapest route

2279 msDeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 fastest measured p50 TTFT via chutes

1412 msLGAI-EXAONE/K-EXAONE-2.0-750B-A37B fastest measured p50 TTFT via friendli

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2LGAI-EXAONE/K-EXAONE-2.0-750B-A37B

Model iddeepseek/deepseek-v3.2lgai-exaone/k-exaone-2.0-750b-a37b

Publisher DeepSeek FriendliAI

AI IQ IQ 103#57 —

Context163,840 tokens262,144 tokens

Provider routes172

Cheapest route$0.672/1M$3.15/1M

Privacy posturehas confidential-compute routeprovider posture varies

Fastest measured p50 TTFT2279 ms via chutes1412 ms via friendli

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 routes

Overview17 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

LGAI-EXAONE/K-EXAONE-2.0-750B-A37B routes

Overview2 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.264 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K350 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.647 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 042346 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro44 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b43 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B41 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.141 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek/deepseek-v3.2",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 or LGAI-EXAONE/K-EXAONE-2.0-750B-A37B?

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 or LGAI-EXAONE/K-EXAONE-2.0-750B-A37B cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.672/1M for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 and $3.15/1M for LGAI-EXAONE/K-EXAONE-2.0-750B-A37B. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 or LGAI-EXAONE/K-EXAONE-2.0-750B-A37B faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 2279 ms for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 and 1412 ms for LGAI-EXAONE/K-EXAONE-2.0-750B-A37B. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 and LGAI-EXAONE/K-EXAONE-2.0-750B-A37B with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between deepseek/deepseek-v3.2 and lgai-exaone/k-exaone-2.0-750b-a37b. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.