OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Recraft V4 Pro

DeepSeek V3.2 vs Recraft V4 Pro: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Recraft V4 Pro has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 has more provider fallback routes, while DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

$0.6752/1MDeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 cheapest route

selected routeRecraft V4 Pro cheapest route

1179 msDeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 fastest measured p50 TTFT via friendli

not enough dataRecraft V4 Pro fastest measured p50 TTFT

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2Recraft V4 Pro

Model iddeepseek/deepseek-v3.2recraft/recraftv4_pro

Publisher DeepSeek Recraft

AI IQ IQ 103#66 —

Context163,840 tokens0 tokens

Provider routes191

Cheapest route$0.6752/1Mselected route

Privacy posturehas provider E2EE routeprovider posture varies

Fastest measured p50 TTFT1179 ms via friendlinot enough data

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime range85.71% to 100.00%not enough data

Modes chat

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 routes

Overview19 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Recraft V4 Pro routes

Overview1 endpoints

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.271 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K356 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 073152 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.650 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b50 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 042348 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 042347 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B46 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek/deepseek-v3.2",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 or Recraft V4 Pro?

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 or Recraft V4 Pro cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.6752/1M for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 and selected route for Recraft V4 Pro. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 or Recraft V4 Pro faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1179 ms for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 and not enough data for Recraft V4 Pro. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 and Recraft V4 Pro with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between deepseek/deepseek-v3.2 and recraft/recraftv4_pro. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.