OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 has more provider fallback routes, while Z.ai: GLM 5.3 has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

$4.1989/1MMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 cheapest route

$6.119/1MZ.ai: GLM 5.3 cheapest route

1485 msMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 fastest measured p50 TTFT via digitalocean

not enough dataZ.ai: GLM 5.3 fastest measured p50 TTFT

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6Z.ai: GLM 5.3

Model idmoonshotai/kimi-k2.6z-ai/glm-5.3

Publisher Kimi Z.AI

AI IQ IQ 119#24 IQ 123#15

Context262,144 tokens1,048,576 tokens

Provider routes316

Cheapest route$4.1989/1M$6.119/1M

Privacy posturehas provider E2EE routeprovider posture varies

Fastest measured p50 TTFT1485 ms via digitaloceannot enough data

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%not enough data

Modes chat chat

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 routes

Overview31 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Z.ai: GLM 5.3 routes

Overview6 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.283 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K368 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.664 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b62 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.660 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.659 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.658 combined provider routes
Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.358 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="moonshotai/kimi-k2.6",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 or Z.ai: GLM 5.3?

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 or Z.ai: GLM 5.3 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $4.1989/1M for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 and $6.119/1M for Z.ai: GLM 5.3. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 or Z.ai: GLM 5.3 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1485 ms for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 and not enough data for Z.ai: GLM 5.3. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 and Z.ai: GLM 5.3 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between moonshotai/kimi-k2.6 and z-ai/glm-5.3. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.