OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1

Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Z.ai: GLM 5.1 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Z.ai: GLM 5.1 has more provider fallback routes, while Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

$8.4/1MQwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B cheapest route

$4.263/1MZ.ai: GLM 5.1 cheapest route

not enough dataQwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B fastest measured p50 TTFT

664 msZ.ai: GLM 5.1 fastest measured p50 TTFT via wafer

Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BZ.ai: GLM 5.1

Model idqwen/qwen3.8-2.4t-a95bz-ai/glm-5.1

Publisher DeepInfra Z.AI

AI IQ — IQ 114#32

Context1,000,000 tokens204,800 tokens

Provider routes424

Cheapest route$8.4/1M$4.263/1M

Privacy posturehas ZDR routehas confidential-compute route

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data664 ms via wafer

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime range0.00% to 100.00%75.00% to 100.00%

Modes chat chat

Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B routes

Overview4 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Z.ai: GLM 5.1 routes

Overview24 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Z.ai: GLM 5.1 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.271 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.157 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.154 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.153 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Z.ai: GLM 5.151 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.150 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.148 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.144 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen/qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Z.ai: GLM 5.1?

Is Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Z.ai: GLM 5.1 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $8.4/1M for Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and $4.263/1M for Z.ai: GLM 5.1. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Z.ai: GLM 5.1 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and 664 ms for Z.ai: GLM 5.1. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Z.ai: GLM 5.1 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between qwen/qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b and z-ai/glm-5.1. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.