OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7 vs gpt-oss-120b: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b has more provider fallback routes, while anthropic/claude-opus-4-7 has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

$31.5/1Manthropic/claude-opus-4-7 cheapest route

$0.21735/1MOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b cheapest route

not enough dataanthropic/claude-opus-4-7 fastest measured p50 TTFT

969 msOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b fastest measured p50 TTFT via parasail

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b

Model idanthropic/claude-opus-4-7openai/gpt-oss-120b

Publisher Anthropic OpenAI

AI IQ — IQ 105#53

Context1,000,000 tokens131,072 tokens

Provider routes226

Cheapest route$31.5/1M$0.21735/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas provider E2EE route

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data969 ms via parasail

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime rangenot enough data85.71% to 100.00%

Modes chat messages chat

anthropic/claude-opus-4-7 routes

Overview2 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b routes

Overview26 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.273 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b59 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b56 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b55 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b53 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b50 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.150 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b46 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="anthropic/claude-opus-4-7",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, anthropic/claude-opus-4-7 or OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b?

Is anthropic/claude-opus-4-7 or OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $31.5/1M for anthropic/claude-opus-4-7 and $0.21735/1M for OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is anthropic/claude-opus-4-7 or OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for anthropic/claude-opus-4-7 and 969 ms for OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test anthropic/claude-opus-4-7 and OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between anthropic/claude-opus-4-7 and openai/gpt-oss-120b. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.