OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

Claude Sonnet 5 CC Max vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1

Claude Sonnet 5 CC Max vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Z.ai: GLM 5.1 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Z.ai: GLM 5.1 has more provider fallback routes, while Claude Sonnet 5 CC Max has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

$12.66/1MClaude Sonnet 5 CC Max cheapest route

$4.2833/1MZ.ai: GLM 5.1 cheapest route

not enough dataClaude Sonnet 5 CC Max fastest measured p50 TTFT

1566 msZ.ai: GLM 5.1 fastest measured p50 TTFT via parasail

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Claude Sonnet 5 CC MaxZ.ai: GLM 5.1

Model idanthropic/claude-sonnet-5-ccmaxz-ai/glm-5.1

Publisher Anthropic Z.AI

AI IQ — IQ 114#39

Context1,000,000 tokens204,800 tokens

Provider routes024

Cheapest route$12.66/1M$4.2833/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas provider E2EE route

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data1566 ms via parasail

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime rangenot enough data66.67% to 100.00%

Modes chat messages chat

Claude Sonnet 5 CC Max routes

Overview0 endpoints

Z.ai: GLM 5.1 routes

Overview24 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Z.ai: GLM 5.1 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.277 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.161 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.159 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.157 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.156 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.154 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.153 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.152 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-ccmax",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Claude Sonnet 5 CC Max or Z.ai: GLM 5.1?

Is Claude Sonnet 5 CC Max or Z.ai: GLM 5.1 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $12.66/1M for Claude Sonnet 5 CC Max and $4.2833/1M for Z.ai: GLM 5.1. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Claude Sonnet 5 CC Max or Z.ai: GLM 5.1 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for Claude Sonnet 5 CC Max and 1566 ms for Z.ai: GLM 5.1. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Claude Sonnet 5 CC Max and Z.ai: GLM 5.1 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-ccmax and z-ai/glm-5.1. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.