OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

ByteDance Seedance 2.0 vs MiniMax: MiniMax M3

ByteDance Seedance 2.0 vs MiniMax: MiniMax M3: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

ByteDance Seedance 2.0 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. MiniMax: MiniMax M3 has more provider fallback routes, while MiniMax: MiniMax M3 has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

selected routeByteDance Seedance 2.0 cheapest route

$1.25545/1MMiniMax: MiniMax M3 cheapest route

not enough dataByteDance Seedance 2.0 fastest measured p50 TTFT

978 msMiniMax: MiniMax M3 fastest measured p50 TTFT via fireworks

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

ByteDance Seedance 2.0MiniMax: MiniMax M3

Model idbytedance/seedance-2.0minimax/minimax-m3

Publisher Venice DeepInfra

AI IQ — IQ 114#40

Context10,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens

Provider routes120

Cheapest routeselected route$1.25545/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas ZDR route

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data978 ms via fireworks

Highest measured throughputnot enough data110 tok/s via minimax

Recent route uptime rangenot enough data50.00% to 100.00%

Modes chat

ByteDance Seedance 2.0 routes

Overview1 endpoints

MiniMax: MiniMax M3 routes

Overview20 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.273 combined provider routes
MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K357 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs MiniMax: MiniMax M355 combined provider routes
MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b53 combined provider routes
MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.652 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs MiniMax: MiniMax M350 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs MiniMax: MiniMax M349 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MiniMax: MiniMax M348 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="bytedance/seedance-2.0",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, ByteDance Seedance 2.0 or MiniMax: MiniMax M3?

Is ByteDance Seedance 2.0 or MiniMax: MiniMax M3 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is selected route for ByteDance Seedance 2.0 and $1.25545/1M for MiniMax: MiniMax M3. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is ByteDance Seedance 2.0 or MiniMax: MiniMax M3 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for ByteDance Seedance 2.0 and 978 ms for MiniMax: MiniMax M3. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test ByteDance Seedance 2.0 and MiniMax: MiniMax M3 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between bytedance/seedance-2.0 and minimax/minimax-m3. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.