Free to start

Lucy Image 2 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Try both on us. Starter credit covers your first requests, then one key routes Lucy Image 2 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash. Switch by changing the model name.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has more Credits provider routes. A published Credits price comparison is not available for both models. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

selected routeLucy Image 2 cheapest route

$0.1266/1MDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cheapest route

not enough dataLucy Image 2 fastest measured p50 TTFT

957 msDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash fastest measured p50 TTFT via together

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Lucy Image 2DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Model iddecart/lucy-image-2deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash

Publisher Decart DeepSeek

AI IQ — IQ 126#22

Context0 tokens1,048,576 tokens

Credits provider routes124

Cheapest routeselected route$0.1266/1M

Cached inputNot published$0.01/1M to $0.1899/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas Confidential route (E2EE + ZDR)

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data957 ms via together

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime rangenot enough data98.56% to 100.00%

Modes chat decide

Lucy Image 2 routes

Overview1 Credits routes

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash routes

Overview24 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.357 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.256 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash56 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K352 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash50 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b48 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B43 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.641 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

Questions

Which should I use, Lucy Image 2 or DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has more Credits provider routes. A published Credits price comparison is not available for both models. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

Is Lucy Image 2 or DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is selected route for Lucy Image 2 and $0.1266/1M for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Lucy Image 2 or DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for Lucy Image 2 and 957 ms for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Lucy Image 2 and DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash with the same API?

Both use the same TrustedRouter base URL and API key. At least one of them is not a chat model, so the request can differ as well as the model id: the API docs list the route for each kind of model.