OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs fugu-ultra-v1.1

DeepSeek V3.2 vs fugu-ultra-v1.1: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 has more provider fallback routes, while fugu-ultra-v1.1 has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 with the lower p50 TTFT.

$0.6752/1MDeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 cheapest route

$35/1Mfugu-ultra-v1.1 cheapest route

1546 msDeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 fastest measured p50 TTFT via digitalocean

6609 msfugu-ultra-v1.1 fastest measured p50 TTFT via sakana

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2fugu-ultra-v1.1

Model iddeepseek/deepseek-v3.2sakana-ai/fugu-ultra-v1.1

Publisher DeepSeek Sakana AI

AI IQ IQ 103#66 —

Context163,840 tokens1,000,000 tokens

Provider routes191

Cheapest route$0.6752/1M$35/1M

Privacy posturehas provider E2EE routeprovider posture varies

Fastest measured p50 TTFT1546 ms via digitalocean6609 ms via sakana

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 routes

Overview19 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

fugu-ultra-v1.1 routes

Overview1 endpoints

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.273 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K357 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 073155 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b54 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.651 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 042350 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B49 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 042346 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek/deepseek-v3.2",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 or fugu-ultra-v1.1?

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 or fugu-ultra-v1.1 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.6752/1M for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 and $35/1M for fugu-ultra-v1.1. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 or fugu-ultra-v1.1 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1546 ms for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 and 6609 ms for fugu-ultra-v1.1. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 and fugu-ultra-v1.1 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between deepseek/deepseek-v3.2 and sakana-ai/fugu-ultra-v1.1. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.