OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Tencent: Hy3

DeepSeek V3.2 vs Tencent: Hy3: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 has more provider fallback routes, while Tencent: Hy3 has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show Tencent: Hy3 with the lower p50 TTFT.

$0.6752/1MDeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 cheapest route

$0.6963/1MTencent: Hy3 cheapest route

2583 msDeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 fastest measured p50 TTFT via friendli

746 msTencent: Hy3 fastest measured p50 TTFT via deepinfra

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2Tencent: Hy3

Model iddeepseek/deepseek-v3.2tencent/hy3

Publisher DeepSeek DeepInfra

AI IQ IQ 103#74 IQ 103#77

Context163,840 tokens262,144 tokens

Credits provider routes94

Cheapest route$0.6752/1M$0.6963/1M

Cached input$0.079125/1M to $0.754378/1M$0.034815/1M to $0.05275/1M

Privacy posturehas provider E2EE routeprovider posture varies

Fastest measured p50 TTFT2583 ms via friendli746 ms via deepinfra

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 routes

Overview9 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Tencent: Hy3 routes

Overview4 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.240 combined provider routes
Tencent: Hy3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.235 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K332 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 073131 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.331 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash29 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.628 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b28 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek/deepseek-v3.2",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 or Tencent: Hy3?

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 or Tencent: Hy3 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.6752/1M for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 and $0.6963/1M for Tencent: Hy3. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 or Tencent: Hy3 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 2583 ms for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 and 746 ms for Tencent: Hy3. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 and Tencent: Hy3 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between deepseek/deepseek-v3.2 and tencent/hy3. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.