Free to start

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash

Try both on us. Starter credit covers your first requests, then one key routes DeepSeek V3.2 and GLM 4.7 Flash. Switch by changing the model name.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

DeepSeek V3.2 has more Credits provider routes. Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash has the lower published input-plus-output rate and the lower measured p50 time to first token. Their context windows are the same size.

$0.6752/1MDeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 cheapest route

$0.4853/1MZ.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash cheapest route

1793 msDeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 fastest measured p50 TTFT via digitalocean

886 msZ.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash fastest measured p50 TTFT via greenference

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash

Model iddeepseek/deepseek-v3.2z-ai/glm-4.7-flash

Publisher DeepSeek Z.AI

AI IQ IQ 102#110 —

Context131,072 tokens131,072 tokens

Credits provider routes96

Cheapest route$0.6752/1M$0.4853/1M

Cached input$0.1055/1M to $0.714109/1M$0.01055/1M to $0.03442/1M

Privacy posturehas Confidential route (E2EE + ZDR)has ZDR route

Fastest measured p50 TTFT1793 ms via digitalocean886 ms via greenference

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 routes

Overview9 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash routes

Overview6 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.342 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.241 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash41 combined provider routes
Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.339 combined provider routes
Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.238 combined provider routes
Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash38 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K337 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 073135 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek/deepseek-v3.2",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 or Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash?

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 or Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.6752/1M for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 and $0.4853/1M for Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 or Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1793 ms for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 and 886 ms for Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 and Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between deepseek/deepseek-v3.2 and z-ai/glm-4.7-flash. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.