OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Proxy: zai-org/GLM-4.7

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Proxy: zai-org/GLM-4.7: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has more provider fallback routes, while DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

$0.273/1MDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 cheapest route

$2.94/1MProxy: zai-org/GLM-4.7 cheapest route

585 msDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 fastest measured p50 TTFT via pearl

not enough dataProxy: zai-org/GLM-4.7 fastest measured p50 TTFT

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Proxy: zai-org/GLM-4.7

Model iddeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731z-ai/glm-4.7-fp8

Publisher DeepSeek Z.AI

AI IQ — —

Context1,048,576 tokens202,752 tokens

Provider routes201

Cheapest route$0.273/1M$2.94/1M

Privacy posturehas ZDR routeprovider posture varies

Fastest measured p50 TTFT585 ms via pearlnot enough data

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%not enough data

Modes chat chat

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 routes

Overview20 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Proxy: zai-org/GLM-4.7 routes

Overview1 endpoints

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.267 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K353 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.650 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 073149 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro47 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b46 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B44 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.144 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Proxy: zai-org/GLM-4.7?

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Proxy: zai-org/GLM-4.7 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.273/1M for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and $2.94/1M for Proxy: zai-org/GLM-4.7. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Proxy: zai-org/GLM-4.7 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 585 ms for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and not enough data for Proxy: zai-org/GLM-4.7. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Proxy: zai-org/GLM-4.7 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731 and z-ai/glm-4.7-fp8. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.