OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 has more provider fallback routes, while DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 with the lower p50 TTFT.

$0.2478/1MDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 cheapest route

$4.725/1MGoogle: Gemini 3.7 Flash cheapest route

374 msDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 fastest measured p50 TTFT via pearl

1568 msGoogle: Gemini 3.7 Flash fastest measured p50 TTFT via google-vertex

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash

Model iddeepseek/deepseek-v4-flashgoogle/gemini-3.7-flash

Publisher DeepSeek Google AI Studio

AI IQ IQ 113#35 —

Context1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens

Provider routes291

Cheapest route$0.2478/1M$4.725/1M

Privacy posturehas provider E2EE routehas ZDR route

Fastest measured p50 TTFT374 ms via pearl1568 ms via google-vertex

Highest measured throughput113 tok/s via makoranot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 routes

Overview29 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash routes

Overview1 endpoints

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.276 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K362 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.659 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro56 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b55 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B53 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.153 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 073149 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 or Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 or Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.2478/1M for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and $4.725/1M for Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 or Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 374 ms for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and 1568 ms for Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash and google/gemini-3.7-flash. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.