OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 has more provider fallback routes, while DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B with the lower p50 TTFT.

$4.1145/1MDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 cheapest route

$8.44/1MQwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B cheapest route

1344 msDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 fastest measured p50 TTFT via parasail

674 msQwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B fastest measured p50 TTFT via together

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Model iddeepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0423qwen/qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b

Publisher DeepSeek DeepInfra

AI IQ — IQ 122#24

Context1,048,576 tokens262,144 tokens

Credits provider routes44

Cheapest route$4.1145/1M$8.44/1M

Cached input$0.1055/1M to $0.34815/1M$0.211/1M to $0.26375/1M

Privacy posturehas ZDR routehas ZDR route

Fastest measured p50 TTFT1344 ms via parasail674 ms via together

Highest measured throughput58 tok/s via parasailnot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 routes

Overview4 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B routes

Overview4 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.232 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.232 combined provider routes
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.331 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.331 combined provider routes
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash30 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash30 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 042328 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B28 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0423",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 or Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 or Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $4.1145/1M for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and $8.44/1M for Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 or Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1344 ms for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and 674 ms for Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0423 and qwen/qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.