OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway
Onebase URL to migrate
100sof models and routes
0prompt or output logs. Always.
Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.
Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.
Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has more Credits provider routes. A published Credits price comparison is not available for both models. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

$0.1266/1MDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cheapest route
selected routeRecraft V4.1 Utility Pro cheapest route
775 msDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash fastest measured p50 TTFT via together
not enough dataRecraft V4.1 Utility Pro fastest measured p50 TTFT

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 FlashRecraft V4.1 Utility Pro
Model iddeepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flashrecraft/recraftv4_1_utility_pro
AI IQ IQ 125#22 —
Context1,048,576 tokens0 tokens
Credits provider routes211
Cheapest route$0.1266/1Mselected route
Cached input$0.01/1M to $0.163631/1MNot published
Privacy posturehas Confidential route (E2EE + ZDR)provider posture varies
Fastest measured p50 TTFT775 ms via togethernot enough data
Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data
Recent route uptime range0.00% to 100.00%not enough data
Modes chat decide

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash routes

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro routes

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison
Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython
client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has more Credits provider routes. A published Credits price comparison is not available for both models. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.1266/1M for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and selected route for Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 775 ms for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and not enough data for Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro with the same API?

Both use the same TrustedRouter base URL and API key. At least one of them is not a chat model, so the request can differ as well as the model id: the API docs list the route for each kind of model.

Workspace access

Sign in

Choose a sign in method to access your TrustedRouter workspace.

By signing in you agree to the terms of service and privacy policy.