Free to start

MythoMax 13B vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B

Try both on us. Starter credit covers your first requests, then one key routes MythoMax 13B and Qwen3.8 27B. Switch by changing the model name.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

MythoMax 13B has the lower measured p50 time to first token. Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B has the lower published input-plus-output rate, more Credits provider routes and the larger context window.

$0.844/1MMythoMax 13B cheapest route

$0.385075/1MQwen: Qwen3.8 27B cheapest route

750 msMythoMax 13B fastest measured p50 TTFT via mancer

1038 msQwen: Qwen3.8 27B fastest measured p50 TTFT via cerebras

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

MythoMax 13BQwen: Qwen3.8 27B

Model idgryphe/mythomax-l2-13bqwen/qwen3.8-27b

PublisherGryphe Alibaba Cloud Model Studio

AI IQ — IQ 116#52

Context8,192 tokens65,536 tokens

Credits provider routes219

Cheapest route$0.844/1M$0.385075/1M

Cached inputNot published$0.01/1M to $0.19834/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas Confidential route (E2EE + ZDR)

Fastest measured p50 TTFT750 ms via mancer1038 ms via cerebras

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

MythoMax 13B routes

Overview2 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B routes

Overview19 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.352 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.251 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash51 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B47 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B45 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B43 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B43 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B36 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gryphe/mythomax-l2-13b",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, MythoMax 13B or Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B?

MythoMax 13B has the lower measured p50 time to first token. Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B has the lower published input-plus-output rate, more Credits provider routes and the larger context window.

Is MythoMax 13B or Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.844/1M for MythoMax 13B and $0.385075/1M for Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is MythoMax 13B or Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 750 ms for MythoMax 13B and 1038 ms for Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test MythoMax 13B and Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between gryphe/mythomax-l2-13b and qwen/qwen3.8-27b. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.