OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

Ling-3.0-flash vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b

Ling-3.0-flash vs gpt-oss-120b: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b has more provider fallback routes, while Ling-3.0-flash has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

$0.2532/1MLing-3.0-flash cheapest route

$0.218385/1MOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b cheapest route

not enough dataLing-3.0-flash fastest measured p50 TTFT

1164 msOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b fastest measured p50 TTFT via baseten

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Ling-3.0-flashOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b

Model idinclusionai/ling-3.0-flashopenai/gpt-oss-120b

Publisher DeepInfra OpenAI

AI IQ IQ 92#103 IQ 105#63

Context262,144 tokens131,072 tokens

Provider routes431

Cheapest route$0.2532/1M$0.218385/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas provider E2EE route

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data1164 ms via baseten

Highest measured throughputnot enough data179 tok/s via sambanova

Recent route uptime rangenot enough data100.00%

Modes chat chat

Ling-3.0-flash routes

Overview4 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b routes

Overview31 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.283 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b68 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b64 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b62 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b60 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b59 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b58 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.154 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="inclusionai/ling-3.0-flash",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Ling-3.0-flash or OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b?

Is Ling-3.0-flash or OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.2532/1M for Ling-3.0-flash and $0.218385/1M for OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Ling-3.0-flash or OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for Ling-3.0-flash and 1164 ms for OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Ling-3.0-flash and OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between inclusionai/ling-3.0-flash and openai/gpt-oss-120b. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.