OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs gpt-oss-120b: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b has more provider fallback routes, while Google: Gemma 4 31B has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show Google: Gemma 4 31B with the lower p50 TTFT.

$0.5355/1MGoogle: Gemma 4 31B cheapest route

$0.21735/1MOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b cheapest route

1178 msGoogle: Gemma 4 31B fastest measured p50 TTFT via digitalocean

1245 msOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b fastest measured p50 TTFT via cloudflare-workers-ai

Google: Gemma 4 31BOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b

Model idgoogle/gemma-4-31b-itopenai/gpt-oss-120b

Publisher Google AI Studio OpenAI

AI IQ IQ 101#66 IQ 105#53

Context262,144 tokens131,072 tokens

Provider routes2325

Cheapest route$0.5355/1M$0.21735/1M

Privacy posturehas provider E2EE routehas provider E2EE route

Fastest measured p50 TTFT1178 ms via digitalocean1245 ms via cloudflare-workers-ai

Highest measured throughput113 tok/s via tinfoil272 tok/s via cerebras

Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

Google: Gemma 4 31B routes

Overview23 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b routes

Overview25 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.270 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.268 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b55 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b55 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.653 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K353 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b49 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b49 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="google/gemma-4-31b-it",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Google: Gemma 4 31B or OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b?

Is Google: Gemma 4 31B or OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.5355/1M for Google: Gemma 4 31B and $0.21735/1M for OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Google: Gemma 4 31B or OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1178 ms for Google: Gemma 4 31B and 1245 ms for OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Google: Gemma 4 31B and OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between google/gemma-4-31b-it and openai/gpt-oss-120b. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.