OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

Jina AI: Jina Embeddings v2 Base EN vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B

Jina AI: Jina Embeddings v2 Base EN has the lower published input-plus-output rate. Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B has more Credits provider routes and the larger context window. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed. Compare price, speed, context, and privacy.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

$0.05275/1MJina AI: Jina Embeddings v2 Base EN cheapest route

$0.385075/1MQwen: Qwen3.8 27B cheapest route

not enough dataJina AI: Jina Embeddings v2 Base EN fastest measured p50 TTFT

852 msQwen: Qwen3.8 27B fastest measured p50 TTFT via cerebras

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Jina AI: Jina Embeddings v2 Base ENQwen: Qwen3.8 27B

Model idjina-ai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-enqwen/qwen3.8-27b

Publisher Jina AI Alibaba Cloud Model Studio

AI IQ — IQ 116#50

Context8,192 tokens65,536 tokens

Credits provider routes118

Cheapest route$0.05275/1M$0.385075/1M

Cached inputNot published$0.01/1M to $0.241595/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas Confidential route (E2EE + ZDR)

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data852 ms via cerebras

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime rangenot enough data98.70% to 100.00%

Modes embeddings chat

Jina AI: Jina Embeddings v2 Base EN routes

Overview1 Credits routes

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B routes

Overview18 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash52 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.351 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.250 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B47 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B45 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B42 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B41 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B35 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

Questions

Which should I use, Jina AI: Jina Embeddings v2 Base EN or Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B?

Is Jina AI: Jina Embeddings v2 Base EN or Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.05275/1M for Jina AI: Jina Embeddings v2 Base EN and $0.385075/1M for Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Jina AI: Jina Embeddings v2 Base EN or Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for Jina AI: Jina Embeddings v2 Base EN and 852 ms for Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Jina AI: Jina Embeddings v2 Base EN and Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B with the same API?

Both use the same TrustedRouter base URL and API key. At least one of them is not a chat model, so the request can differ as well as the model id: the API docs list the route for each kind of model.