@cf/meta/llama-3.1-8b-instruct-fp8 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1
@cf/meta/llama-3.1-8b-instruct-fp8 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.
Practical read
Monthly evidence@cf/meta/llama-3.1-8b-instruct-fp8 has the lower published input-plus-output rate. Z.ai: GLM 5.1 has more Credits provider routes and the larger context window. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.
The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.
meta-llama/llama-3.1-8b-instruct-fp8z-ai/glm-5.1
@cf/meta/llama-3.1-8b-instruct-fp8 routes
- Overview1 Credits routes
Z.ai: GLM 5.1 routes
- Overview12 Credits routes
- PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
- BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
- ProvidersAll serving providers
Related comparisons
Browse every comparison- Z.ai: GLM 5.1 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.240 combined provider routes
- Z.ai: GLM 5.1 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.338 combined provider routes
- DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.137 combined provider routes
- Z.ai: GLM 5.1 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash37 combined provider routes
- MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.136 combined provider routes
- OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.134 combined provider routes
- MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.131 combined provider routes
- DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.129 combined provider routes
Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.
TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.
client = OpenAI(
base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="meta-llama/llama-3.1-8b-instruct-fp8",
messages=messages,
)
Questions
Which should I use, @cf/meta/llama-3.1-8b-instruct-fp8 or Z.ai: GLM 5.1?
@cf/meta/llama-3.1-8b-instruct-fp8 has the lower published input-plus-output rate. Z.ai: GLM 5.1 has more Credits provider routes and the larger context window. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.
Is @cf/meta/llama-3.1-8b-instruct-fp8 or Z.ai: GLM 5.1 cheaper?
The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.463145/1M for @cf/meta/llama-3.1-8b-instruct-fp8 and $4.2833/1M for Z.ai: GLM 5.1. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.
Is @cf/meta/llama-3.1-8b-instruct-fp8 or Z.ai: GLM 5.1 faster?
Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for @cf/meta/llama-3.1-8b-instruct-fp8 and 1088 ms for Z.ai: GLM 5.1. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.
Can I test @cf/meta/llama-3.1-8b-instruct-fp8 and Z.ai: GLM 5.1 with the same API?
Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between meta-llama/llama-3.1-8b-instruct-fp8 and z-ai/glm-5.1. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.