OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b

Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs gpt-oss-120b: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b has more provider fallback routes, while Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct with the lower p50 TTFT.

$0.56175/1MMeta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct cheapest route

$0.21735/1MOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b cheapest route

348 msMeta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct fastest measured p50 TTFT via crusoe

821 msOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b fastest measured p50 TTFT via together

Meta: Llama 3.3 70B InstructOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b

Model idmeta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instructopenai/gpt-oss-120b

Publisher Cerebras OpenAI

AI IQ — IQ 105#53

Context131,072 tokens131,072 tokens

Provider routes1525

Cheapest route$0.56175/1M$0.21735/1M

Privacy posturehas provider E2EE routehas provider E2EE route

Fastest measured p50 TTFT348 ms via crusoe821 ms via together

Highest measured throughputnot enough data271 tok/s via cerebras

Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct routes

Overview15 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b routes

Overview25 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.270 combined provider routes
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Z.ai: GLM 5.260 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b55 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b55 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b49 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b49 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.149 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b48 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b?

Is Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.56175/1M for Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and $0.21735/1M for OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 348 ms for Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and 821 ms for OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct and openai/gpt-oss-120b. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.