Free to start

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 4.7

Try both on us. Starter credit covers your first requests, then one key routes MiniMax M3.1 Flash and GLM 4.7. Switch by changing the model name.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the lower published input-plus-output rate, the larger context window and the lower measured p50 time to first token. Z.ai: GLM 4.7 has more Credits provider routes.

$0.79125/1MMiniMax M3.1 Flash cheapest route

$2.26825/1MZ.ai: GLM 4.7 cheapest route

956 msMiniMax M3.1 Flash fastest measured p50 TTFT via gmi

1047 msZ.ai: GLM 4.7 fastest measured p50 TTFT via mancer

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

MiniMax M3.1 FlashZ.ai: GLM 4.7

Model idminimax/minimax-m3.1-flashz-ai/glm-4.7

Publisher MiniMax Z.AI

AI IQ IQ 123#32 IQ 104#102

Context1,000,000 tokens202,752 tokens

Credits provider routes57

Cheapest route$0.79125/1M$2.26825/1M

Cached input$0.015825/1M to $0.019782/1M$0.0844/1M to $0.29962/1M

Privacy posturehas ZDR routehas ZDR route

Fastest measured p50 TTFT956 ms via gmi1047 ms via mancer

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

MiniMax M3.1 Flash routes

Overview5 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Z.ai: GLM 4.7 routes

Overview7 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Z.ai: GLM 4.7 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.340 combined provider routes
Z.ai: GLM 4.7 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.239 combined provider routes
Z.ai: GLM 4.7 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash39 combined provider routes
MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.338 combined provider routes
MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.237 combined provider routes
MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash37 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 4.735 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Z.ai: GLM 4.733 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="minimax/minimax-m3.1-flash",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Z.ai: GLM 4.7?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the lower published input-plus-output rate, the larger context window and the lower measured p50 time to first token. Z.ai: GLM 4.7 has more Credits provider routes.

Is MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Z.ai: GLM 4.7 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.79125/1M for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and $2.26825/1M for Z.ai: GLM 4.7. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Z.ai: GLM 4.7 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 956 ms for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and 1047 ms for Z.ai: GLM 4.7. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Z.ai: GLM 4.7 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between minimax/minimax-m3.1-flash and z-ai/glm-4.7. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.