OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

moonshotai/Kimi-K2-Instruct-0905 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b

moonshotai/Kimi-K2-Instruct-0905 vs gpt-oss-120b: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway
Onebase URL to migrate
100sof models and routes
0prompt or output logs. Always.
Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.
Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.
Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b has more provider fallback routes, while moonshotai/Kimi-K2-Instruct-0905 has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

$3.02785/1Mmoonshotai/Kimi-K2-Instruct-0905 cheapest route
$0.211/1MOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b cheapest route
not enough datamoonshotai/Kimi-K2-Instruct-0905 fastest measured p50 TTFT
1198 msOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b fastest measured p50 TTFT via baseten

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

moonshotai/Kimi-K2-Instruct-0905OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b
Model idmoonshotai/kimi-k2-instruct-0905openai/gpt-oss-120b
AI IQ IQ 98#99
Context262,144 tokens131,072 tokens
Credits provider routes122
Cheapest route$3.02785/1M$0.211/1M
Cached input$0.300675/1M$0.015825/1M to $0.1055/1M
Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas provider E2EE route
Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data1198 ms via baseten
Highest measured throughputnot enough data149 tok/s via io-net
Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%
Modes chat chat

moonshotai/Kimi-K2-Instruct-0905 routes

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b routes

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison
Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython
client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="moonshotai/kimi-k2-instruct-0905",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, moonshotai/Kimi-K2-Instruct-0905 or OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b?

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b has more provider fallback routes, while moonshotai/Kimi-K2-Instruct-0905 has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

Is moonshotai/Kimi-K2-Instruct-0905 or OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $3.02785/1M for moonshotai/Kimi-K2-Instruct-0905 and $0.211/1M for OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is moonshotai/Kimi-K2-Instruct-0905 or OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for moonshotai/Kimi-K2-Instruct-0905 and 1198 ms for OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test moonshotai/Kimi-K2-Instruct-0905 and OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between moonshotai/kimi-k2-instruct-0905 and openai/gpt-oss-120b. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.

Workspace access

Sign in

Choose a sign in method to access your TrustedRouter workspace.

By signing in you agree to the terms of service and privacy policy.