Free to start

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs Thinking Machines: Inkling

Try both on us. Starter credit covers your first requests, then one key routes Kimi K2.5 and Inkling. Switch by changing the model name.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 has the lower published input-plus-output rate, more Credits provider routes and the lower measured p50 time to first token. Thinking Machines: Inkling has the larger context window.

$2.79575/1MMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 cheapest route

$5.32775/1MThinking Machines: Inkling cheapest route

878 msMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 fastest measured p50 TTFT via nscale

1441 msThinking Machines: Inkling fastest measured p50 TTFT via thinkingmachines

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5Thinking Machines: Inkling

Model idmoonshotai/kimi-k2.5thinkingmachines/inkling

Publisher Kimi Thinking Machines Lab

AI IQ IQ 110#77 IQ 107#88

Context262,144 tokens524,288 tokens

Credits provider routes103

Cheapest route$2.79575/1M$5.32775/1M

Cached input$0.07385/1M to $0.422/1M$0.17935/1M

Privacy posturehas ZDR routehas ZDR route

Fastest measured p50 TTFT878 ms via nscale1441 ms via thinkingmachines

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 routes

Overview10 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Thinking Machines: Inkling routes

Overview3 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.343 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.242 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash42 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K338 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.536 combined provider routes
Thinking Machines: Inkling vs Z.ai: GLM 5.336 combined provider routes
Thinking Machines: Inkling vs Z.ai: GLM 5.235 combined provider routes
Thinking Machines: Inkling vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash35 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="moonshotai/kimi-k2.5",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 or Thinking Machines: Inkling?

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 or Thinking Machines: Inkling cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $2.79575/1M for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 and $5.32775/1M for Thinking Machines: Inkling. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 or Thinking Machines: Inkling faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 878 ms for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 and 1441 ms for Thinking Machines: Inkling. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 and Thinking Machines: Inkling with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between moonshotai/kimi-k2.5 and thinkingmachines/inkling. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.