OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs GLM 5.2 Fast on Fireworks

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs GLM 5.2 Fast on Fireworks: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 has more provider fallback routes, while GLM 5.2 Fast on Fireworks has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

$2.79575/1MMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 cheapest route

$9.1785/1MGLM 5.2 Fast on Fireworks cheapest route

2671 msMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 fastest measured p50 TTFT via nscale

not enough dataGLM 5.2 Fast on Fireworks fastest measured p50 TTFT

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5GLM 5.2 Fast on Fireworks

Model idmoonshotai/kimi-k2.5z-ai/glm-5.2-fast

Publisher Kimi Z.AI

AI IQ IQ 111#54 —

Context262,144 tokens1,048,576 tokens

Credits provider routes92

Cheapest route$2.79575/1M$9.1785/1M

Cached input$0.07385/1M to $0.422/1M$0.22155/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas ZDR route

Fastest measured p50 TTFT2671 ms via nscalenot enough data

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime range66.67% to 100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 routes

Overview9 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

GLM 5.2 Fast on Fireworks routes

Overview2 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.243 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.534 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K332 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b31 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.331 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.629 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.528 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash28 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="moonshotai/kimi-k2.5",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 or GLM 5.2 Fast on Fireworks?

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 or GLM 5.2 Fast on Fireworks cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $2.79575/1M for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 and $9.1785/1M for GLM 5.2 Fast on Fireworks. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 or GLM 5.2 Fast on Fireworks faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 2671 ms for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 and not enough data for GLM 5.2 Fast on Fireworks. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 and GLM 5.2 Fast on Fireworks with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between moonshotai/kimi-k2.5 and z-ai/glm-5.2-fast. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.