OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Z.ai: GLM 5.1 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Z.ai: GLM 5.1 has more provider fallback routes, while MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code with the lower p50 TTFT.

$4.41/1MMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code cheapest route

$4.263/1MZ.ai: GLM 5.1 cheapest route

801 msMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code fastest measured p50 TTFT via together

1079 msZ.ai: GLM 5.1 fastest measured p50 TTFT via wafer

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 CodeZ.ai: GLM 5.1

Model idmoonshotai/kimi-k2.7-codez-ai/glm-5.1

Publisher Kimi Z.AI

AI IQ IQ 118#22 IQ 114#32

Context262,144 tokens204,800 tokens

Provider routes1924

Cheapest route$4.41/1M$4.263/1M

Privacy posturehas ZDR routehas confidential-compute route

Fastest measured p50 TTFT801 ms via together1079 ms via wafer

Highest measured throughput52 tok/s via novitanot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%66.67% to 100.00%

Modes chat chat

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code routes

Overview19 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Z.ai: GLM 5.1 routes

Overview24 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Z.ai: GLM 5.1 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.269 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Z.ai: GLM 5.264 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.154 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.154 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code49 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K349 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.149 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.148 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code or Z.ai: GLM 5.1?

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code or Z.ai: GLM 5.1 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $4.41/1M for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code and $4.263/1M for Z.ai: GLM 5.1. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code or Z.ai: GLM 5.1 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 801 ms for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code and 1079 ms for Z.ai: GLM 5.1. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code and Z.ai: GLM 5.1 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code and z-ai/glm-5.1. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.