OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Sao10K/L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Sao10K/L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Sao10K/L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 has more provider fallback routes, while MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

$16.065/1MMoonshotAI: Kimi K3 cheapest route

$0.0945/1MSao10K/L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo cheapest route

1399 msMoonshotAI: Kimi K3 fastest measured p50 TTFT via together

not enough dataSao10K/L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo fastest measured p50 TTFT

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3Sao10K/L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo

Model idmoonshotai/kimi-k3sao10k/l3-8b-lunaris-v1-turbo

Publisher Kimi DeepInfra

AI IQ IQ 123#14 —

Context1,048,576 tokens8,192 tokens

Provider routes332

Cheapest route$16.065/1M$0.0945/1M

Privacy posturehas provider E2EE routeprovider posture varies

Fastest measured p50 TTFT1399 ms via togethernot enough data

Highest measured throughput57 tok/s via basetennot enough data

Recent route uptime range0.00% to 100.00%not enough data

Modes chat chat

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 routes

Overview33 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Sao10K/L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo routes

Overview2 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.280 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K363 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K362 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K360 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b59 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K357 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.157 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K353 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="moonshotai/kimi-k3",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 or Sao10K/L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo?

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 or Sao10K/L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $16.065/1M for MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 and $0.0945/1M for Sao10K/L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 or Sao10K/L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1399 ms for MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 and not enough data for Sao10K/L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 and Sao10K/L3-8B-Lunaris-v1-Turbo with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between moonshotai/kimi-k3 and sao10k/l3-8b-lunaris-v1-turbo. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.