OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b has more provider fallback routes, while Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b with the lower p50 TTFT.

$0.211/1MOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b cheapest route

$2.4687/1MQwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B cheapest route

596 msOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b fastest measured p50 TTFT via cerebras

1884 msQwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B fastest measured p50 TTFT via alibaba

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120bQwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Model idopenai/gpt-oss-120bqwen/qwen3.5-122b-a10b

Publisher OpenAI DeepInfra

AI IQ IQ 105#70 —

Context131,072 tokens262,144 tokens

Credits provider routes197

Cheapest route$0.211/1M$2.4687/1M

Cached input$0.015825/1M to $0.1055/1M$0.0422/1M to $0.3165/1M

Privacy posturehas provider E2EE routehas provider E2EE route

Fastest measured p50 TTFT596 ms via cerebras1884 ms via alibaba

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime range0.00% to 100.00%0.00% to 100.00%

Modes chat chat

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b routes

Overview19 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B routes

Overview7 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.250 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b42 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b41 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.341 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash39 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b38 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.238 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b37 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="openai/gpt-oss-120b",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b or Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Is OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b or Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.211/1M for OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b and $2.4687/1M for Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b or Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 596 ms for OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b and 1884 ms for Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b and Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between openai/gpt-oss-120b and qwen/qwen3.5-122b-a10b. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.