OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Llama 3.1 70B Euryale V2.2

gpt-oss-120b vs Llama 3.1 70B Euryale V2.2: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b has more provider fallback routes, while OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

$0.211/1MOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b cheapest route

$3.1228/1MLlama 3.1 70B Euryale V2.2 cheapest route

775 msOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b fastest measured p50 TTFT via cerebras

not enough dataLlama 3.1 70B Euryale V2.2 fastest measured p50 TTFT

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120bLlama 3.1 70B Euryale V2.2

Model idopenai/gpt-oss-120bsao10k/l31-70b-euryale-v2.2

Publisher OpenAI Novita AI

AI IQ IQ 105#69 —

Context131,072 tokens8,192 tokens

Credits provider routes191

Cheapest route$0.211/1M$3.1228/1M

Cached input$0.015825/1M to $0.1055/1MNot published

Privacy posturehas provider E2EE routeprovider posture varies

Fastest measured p50 TTFT775 ms via cerebrasnot enough data

Highest measured throughput60 tok/s via nscalenot enough data

Recent route uptime range0.00% to 100.00%not enough data

Modes chat chat

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b routes

Overview19 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Llama 3.1 70B Euryale V2.2 routes

Overview1 Credits routes

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.250 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b42 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b41 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.341 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash39 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b38 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b37 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b35 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="openai/gpt-oss-120b",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b or Llama 3.1 70B Euryale V2.2?

Is OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b or Llama 3.1 70B Euryale V2.2 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.211/1M for OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b and $3.1228/1M for Llama 3.1 70B Euryale V2.2. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b or Llama 3.1 70B Euryale V2.2 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 775 ms for OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b and not enough data for Llama 3.1 70B Euryale V2.2. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b and Llama 3.1 70B Euryale V2.2 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between openai/gpt-oss-120b and sao10k/l31-70b-euryale-v2.2. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.