OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs remm-slerp:l2-13b

gpt-oss-120b vs remm-slerp:l2-13b: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b has more provider fallback routes, while OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show remm-slerp:l2-13b with the lower p50 TTFT.

$0.218385/1MOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b cheapest route

$1.1605/1Mremm-slerp:l2-13b cheapest route

1164 msOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b fastest measured p50 TTFT via baseten

994 msremm-slerp:l2-13b fastest measured p50 TTFT via mancer

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120bremm-slerp:l2-13b

Model idopenai/gpt-oss-120bundi95/remm-slerp-l2-13b

Publisher OpenAI NextBit

AI IQ IQ 105#63 —

Context131,072 tokens6,144 tokens

Provider routes312

Cheapest route$0.218385/1M$1.1605/1M

Privacy posturehas provider E2EE routeprovider posture varies

Fastest measured p50 TTFT1164 ms via baseten994 ms via mancer

Highest measured throughput224 tok/s via cerebrasnot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b routes

Overview31 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

remm-slerp:l2-13b routes

Overview2 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.283 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b68 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b64 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b62 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b60 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b59 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b58 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.154 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="openai/gpt-oss-120b",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b or remm-slerp:l2-13b?

Is OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b or remm-slerp:l2-13b cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.218385/1M for OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b and $1.1605/1M for remm-slerp:l2-13b. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b or remm-slerp:l2-13b faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1164 ms for OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b and 994 ms for remm-slerp:l2-13b. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b and remm-slerp:l2-13b with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between openai/gpt-oss-120b and undi95/remm-slerp-l2-13b. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.