Free to start

Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Tencent: Hy3

Try both on us. Starter credit covers your first requests, then one key routes Qwen3.6 35B A3B and Hy3. Switch by changing the model name.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B has the lower published input-plus-output rate, more Credits provider routes and the lower measured p50 time to first token. Their context windows are the same size.

$0.363975/1MQwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B cheapest route

$0.6963/1MTencent: Hy3 cheapest route

1099 msQwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B fastest measured p50 TTFT via wandb

2249 msTencent: Hy3 fastest measured p50 TTFT via tencent

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3BTencent: Hy3

Model idqwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3btencent/hy3

Publisher Alibaba Cloud Model Studio Tencent Cloud TokenHub

AI IQ IQ 104#105 IQ 99#128

Context262,144 tokens262,144 tokens

Credits provider routes144

Cheapest route$0.363975/1M$0.6963/1M

Cached input$0.015825/1M to $0.19623/1M$0.034815/1M to $0.05275/1M

Privacy posturehas ZDR routeprovider posture varies

Fastest measured p50 TTFT1099 ms via wandb2249 ms via tencent

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B routes

Overview14 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Tencent: Hy3 routes

Overview4 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.347 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.246 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash46 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B42 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B40 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B38 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B38 combined provider routes
Tencent: Hy3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.337 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3b",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B or Tencent: Hy3?

Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B has the lower published input-plus-output rate, more Credits provider routes and the lower measured p50 time to first token. Their context windows are the same size.

Is Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B or Tencent: Hy3 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.363975/1M for Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B and $0.6963/1M for Tencent: Hy3. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B or Tencent: Hy3 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1099 ms for Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B and 2249 ms for Tencent: Hy3. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B and Tencent: Hy3 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between qwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3b and tencent/hy3. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.