Free to start

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Runway Gen-4.5

Try both on us. Starter credit covers your first requests, then one key routes Qwen3.8 27B and Runway Gen-4.5. Switch by changing the model name.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B has more Credits provider routes and the larger context window. A published Credits price comparison is not available for both models. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

$0.385075/1MQwen: Qwen3.8 27B cheapest route

selected routeRunway Gen-4.5 cheapest route

784 msQwen: Qwen3.8 27B fastest measured p50 TTFT via engy

not enough dataRunway Gen-4.5 fastest measured p50 TTFT

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27BRunway Gen-4.5

Model idqwen/qwen3.8-27brunway/gen-4.5

Publisher Alibaba Cloud Model Studio Runway

AI IQ IQ 116#52 —

Context65,536 tokens1,000 tokens

Credits provider routes192

Cheapest route$0.385075/1Mselected route

Cached input$0.01/1M to $0.19834/1MNot published

Privacy posturehas Confidential route (E2EE + ZDR)provider posture varies

Fastest measured p50 TTFT784 ms via engynot enough data

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%not enough data

Modes chat

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B routes

Overview19 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Runway Gen-4.5 routes

Overview2 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.352 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.251 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash51 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B47 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B45 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B43 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B43 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B36 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen/qwen3.8-27b",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B or Runway Gen-4.5?

Is Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B or Runway Gen-4.5 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.385075/1M for Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B and selected route for Runway Gen-4.5. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B or Runway Gen-4.5 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 784 ms for Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B and not enough data for Runway Gen-4.5. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B and Runway Gen-4.5 with the same API?

Both use the same TrustedRouter base URL and API key. At least one of them is not a chat model, so the request can differ as well as the model id: the API docs list the route for each kind of model.