OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs ScaleDown Compress

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs ScaleDown Compress: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

ScaleDown Compress has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B has more provider fallback routes, while ScaleDown Compress has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B with the lower p50 TTFT.

$0.385075/1MQwen: Qwen3.8 27B cheapest route

$0.05275/1MScaleDown Compress cheapest route

753 msQwen: Qwen3.8 27B fastest measured p50 TTFT via cerebras

1380 msScaleDown Compress fastest measured p50 TTFT via scaledown

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27BScaleDown Compress

Model idqwen/qwen3.8-27bscaledown/compress

Publisher DeepInfra ScaleDown

AI IQ IQ 110#60 —

Context262,144 tokens1,000,000 tokens

Credits provider routes131

Cheapest route$0.385075/1M$0.05275/1M

Cached input$0.015825/1M to $0.16247/1MNot published

Privacy posturehas ZDR routehas ZDR route

Fastest measured p50 TTFT753 ms via cerebras1380 ms via scaledown

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B routes

Overview13 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

ScaleDown Compress routes

Overview1 Credits routes

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.241 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.339 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash39 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B37 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B37 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B35 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B33 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B30 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen/qwen3.8-27b",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B or ScaleDown Compress?

Is Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B or ScaleDown Compress cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.385075/1M for Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B and $0.05275/1M for ScaleDown Compress. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B or ScaleDown Compress faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 753 ms for Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B and 1380 ms for ScaleDown Compress. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B and ScaleDown Compress with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between qwen/qwen3.8-27b and scaledown/compress. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.