OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

Alibaba Wan 2.7 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K3

Alibaba Wan 2.7 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K3: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Alibaba Wan 2.7 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 has more provider fallback routes, while MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

selected routeAlibaba Wan 2.7 cheapest route

$12.66/1MMoonshotAI: Kimi K3 cheapest route

not enough dataAlibaba Wan 2.7 fastest measured p50 TTFT

2377 msMoonshotAI: Kimi K3 fastest measured p50 TTFT via wafer

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Alibaba Wan 2.7MoonshotAI: Kimi K3

Model idalibaba/wan-2.7moonshotai/kimi-k3

Publisher Alibaba Cloud Model Studio Kimi

AI IQ — IQ 123#17

Context5,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens

Provider routes237

Cheapest routeselected route$12.66/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas provider E2EE route

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data2377 ms via wafer

Highest measured throughputnot enough data38 tok/s via relace

Recent route uptime range100.00%0.00% to 100.00%

Modes chat

Alibaba Wan 2.7 routes

Overview2 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 routes

Overview37 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.291 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K372 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b72 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K369 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K368 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K366 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K366 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.161 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="alibaba/wan-2.7",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Alibaba Wan 2.7 or MoonshotAI: Kimi K3?

Is Alibaba Wan 2.7 or MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is selected route for Alibaba Wan 2.7 and $12.66/1M for MoonshotAI: Kimi K3. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Alibaba Wan 2.7 or MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for Alibaba Wan 2.7 and 2377 ms for MoonshotAI: Kimi K3. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Alibaba Wan 2.7 and MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between alibaba/wan-2.7 and moonshotai/kimi-k3. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.