Bring your own key

Claude Sonnet 4 20250514 Coding vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

One key routes both. Starter credit covers your first GLM 5.2 requests, while Claude Sonnet 4 20250514 Coding runs on your own provider key. Switch by changing the model name.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has more Credits provider routes and the larger context window. A published Credits price comparison is not available for both models. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

$18.99/1MClaude Sonnet 4 20250514 Coding cheapest route

$2.2999/1MZ.ai: GLM 5.2 cheapest route

not enough dataClaude Sonnet 4 20250514 Coding fastest measured p50 TTFT

943 msZ.ai: GLM 5.2 fastest measured p50 TTFT via friendli

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Claude Sonnet 4 20250514 CodingZ.ai: GLM 5.2

Model idanthropic/claude-sonnet-4-20250514-codingz-ai/glm-5.2

Publisher Anthropic Z.AI

AI IQ — IQ 118#48

Context200,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens

Credits provider routes032

Cheapest route$18.99/1M$2.2999/1M

Cached inputNot published$0.131875/1M to $0.84611/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas Confidential route (E2EE + ZDR)

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data943 ms via friendli

Highest measured throughputnot enough data257 tok/s via parasail

Recent route uptime rangenot enough data50.00% to 100.00%

Modes chat messages chat

Claude Sonnet 4 20250514 Coding routes

Overview0 Credits routes

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 routes

Overview32 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.365 combined provider routes
Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash64 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.260 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.258 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.256 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.256 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.251 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.249 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-20250514-coding",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Claude Sonnet 4 20250514 Coding or Z.ai: GLM 5.2?

Is Claude Sonnet 4 20250514 Coding or Z.ai: GLM 5.2 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $18.99/1M for Claude Sonnet 4 20250514 Coding and $2.2999/1M for Z.ai: GLM 5.2. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Claude Sonnet 4 20250514 Coding or Z.ai: GLM 5.2 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for Claude Sonnet 4 20250514 Coding and 943 ms for Z.ai: GLM 5.2. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Claude Sonnet 4 20250514 Coding and Z.ai: GLM 5.2 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-20250514-coding and z-ai/glm-5.2. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.