OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

CoBuddy vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code

CoBuddy vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

CoBuddy has the lower published input-plus-output rate. MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code has more Credits provider routes and the larger context window. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

$1.48755/1MCoBuddy cheapest route

$4.131591/1MMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code cheapest route

not enough dataCoBuddy fastest measured p50 TTFT

1728 msMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code fastest measured p50 TTFT via inceptron

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

CoBuddyMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code

Model idbaidu/cobuddymoonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code

Publisher Novita AI Kimi

AI IQ — IQ 108#67

Context131,072 tokens262,144 tokens

Credits provider routes113

Cheapest route$1.48755/1M$4.131591/1M

Cached input$0.07385/1M$0.15825/1M to $0.465255/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas ZDR route

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data1728 ms via inceptron

Highest measured throughputnot enough data84 tok/s via fireworks

Recent route uptime rangenot enough data100.00%

Modes chat chat

CoBuddy routes

Overview1 Credits routes

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code routes

Overview13 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Z.ai: GLM 5.241 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Z.ai: GLM 5.339 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash38 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code37 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K337 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b35 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code32 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code30 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="baidu/cobuddy",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, CoBuddy or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code?

Is CoBuddy or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $1.48755/1M for CoBuddy and $4.131591/1M for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is CoBuddy or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for CoBuddy and 1728 ms for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test CoBuddy and MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between baidu/cobuddy and moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.