Free to start

FLUX.2 [max] vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Try both on us. Starter credit covers your first requests, then one key routes FLUX.2 [max] and GLM 5.2. Switch by changing the model name.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has more Credits provider routes. A published Credits price comparison is not available for both models. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

selected routeFLUX.2 [max] cheapest route

$2.2999/1MZ.ai: GLM 5.2 cheapest route

not enough dataFLUX.2 [max] fastest measured p50 TTFT

943 msZ.ai: GLM 5.2 fastest measured p50 TTFT via friendli

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

FLUX.2 [max]Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Model idblack-forest-labs/flux-2-maxz-ai/glm-5.2

Publisher Black Forest Labs Z.AI

AI IQ — IQ 118#48

Context0 tokens1,048,576 tokens

Credits provider routes132

Cheapest routeselected route$2.2999/1M

Cached inputNot published$0.131875/1M to $0.84611/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas Confidential route (E2EE + ZDR)

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data943 ms via friendli

Highest measured throughputnot enough data257 tok/s via parasail

Recent route uptime rangenot enough data50.00% to 100.00%

Modes chat

FLUX.2 [max] routes

Overview1 Credits routes

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 routes

Overview32 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.365 combined provider routes
Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash64 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.260 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.258 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.256 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.256 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.251 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.249 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

Questions

Which should I use, FLUX.2 [max] or Z.ai: GLM 5.2?

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has more Credits provider routes. A published Credits price comparison is not available for both models. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

Is FLUX.2 [max] or Z.ai: GLM 5.2 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is selected route for FLUX.2 [max] and $2.2999/1M for Z.ai: GLM 5.2. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is FLUX.2 [max] or Z.ai: GLM 5.2 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for FLUX.2 [max] and 943 ms for Z.ai: GLM 5.2. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test FLUX.2 [max] and Z.ai: GLM 5.2 with the same API?

Both use the same TrustedRouter base URL and API key. At least one of them is not a chat model, so the request can differ as well as the model id: the API docs list the route for each kind of model.