OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

Decart Lucy 2.5 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423

Decart Lucy 2.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Decart Lucy 2.5 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 has more provider fallback routes, while DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

selected routeDecart Lucy 2.5 cheapest route

$2.75355/1MDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 cheapest route

not enough dataDecart Lucy 2.5 fastest measured p50 TTFT

1270 msDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 fastest measured p50 TTFT via baseten

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Decart Lucy 2.5DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423

Model iddecart/lucy-2.5deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro

Publisher Decart DeepSeek

AI IQ — IQ 117#32

Context10,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens

Provider routes128

Cheapest routeselected route$2.75355/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas ZDR route

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data1270 ms via baseten

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime rangenot enough data100.00%

Modes chat

Decart Lucy 2.5 routes

Overview1 endpoints

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 routes

Overview28 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.280 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K365 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 042361 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.659 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b59 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 042357 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B55 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.151 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="decart/lucy-2.5",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Decart Lucy 2.5 or DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423?

Is Decart Lucy 2.5 or DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is selected route for Decart Lucy 2.5 and $2.75355/1M for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Decart Lucy 2.5 or DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for Decart Lucy 2.5 and 1270 ms for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Decart Lucy 2.5 and DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between decart/lucy-2.5 and deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.