Bring your own key

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen3 8B 0528 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

One key routes both. Starter credit covers your first GLM 5.2 requests, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen3 8B 0528 runs on your own provider key. Switch by changing the model name.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has more Credits provider routes and the larger context window. A published Credits price comparison is not available for both models. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

$0.15825/1MDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen3 8B 0528 cheapest route

$2.2999/1MZ.ai: GLM 5.2 cheapest route

not enough dataDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen3 8B 0528 fastest measured p50 TTFT

1102 msZ.ai: GLM 5.2 fastest measured p50 TTFT via friendli

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen3 8B 0528Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Model iddeepseek/deepseek-r1-0528-qwen3-8bz-ai/glm-5.2

Publisher DeepSeek Z.AI

AI IQ — IQ 118#50

Context128,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens

Credits provider routes032

Cheapest route$0.15825/1M$2.2999/1M

Cached inputNot published$0.131875/1M to $0.84611/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas Confidential route (E2EE + ZDR)

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data1102 ms via friendli

Highest measured throughputnot enough data195 tok/s via arcee

Recent route uptime rangenot enough data69.23% to 100.00%

Modes chat chat

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen3 8B 0528 routes

Overview0 Credits routes

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 routes

Overview32 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.365 combined provider routes
Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash64 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.260 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.258 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.256 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.256 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.252 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.249 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek/deepseek-r1-0528-qwen3-8b",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen3 8B 0528 or Z.ai: GLM 5.2?

Is DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen3 8B 0528 or Z.ai: GLM 5.2 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.15825/1M for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen3 8B 0528 and $2.2999/1M for Z.ai: GLM 5.2. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen3 8B 0528 or Z.ai: GLM 5.2 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen3 8B 0528 and 1102 ms for Z.ai: GLM 5.2. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen3 8B 0528 and Z.ai: GLM 5.2 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between deepseek/deepseek-r1-0528-qwen3-8b and z-ai/glm-5.2. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.