OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B : compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B has more provider fallback routes, while DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

$4.1145/1MDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 cheapest route

$0.422/1MGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B cheapest route

not enough dataDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 fastest measured p50 TTFT

1525 msGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B fastest measured p50 TTFT via siliconflow

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Model iddeepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0423google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it

Publisher DeepSeek Google AI Studio

AI IQ — IQ 96#101

Context1,024,000 tokens262,144 tokens

Credits provider routes48

Cheapest route$4.1145/1M$0.422/1M

Cached input$0.1055/1M to $0.34815/1M$0.03587/1M to $0.0633/1M

Privacy posturehas ZDR routehas ZDR route

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data1525 ms via siliconflow

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 routes

Overview4 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B routes

Overview8 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.239 combined provider routes
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.235 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K331 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B 30 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.330 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash28 combined provider routes
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K327 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.627 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0423",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 or Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B ?

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 or Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $4.1145/1M for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and $0.422/1M for Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B . The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 or Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and 1525 ms for Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B . These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0423 and google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.