OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway
Onebase URL to migrate
100sof models and routes
0prompt or output logs. Always.
Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.
Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.
Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code has more provider fallback routes, while DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code with the lower p50 TTFT.

$2.7852/1MDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 cheapest route
$4.29385/1MMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code cheapest route
1714 msDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 fastest measured p50 TTFT via baseten
1263 msMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code fastest measured p50 TTFT via fireworks

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code
Model iddeepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code
AI IQ IQ 118#33
Context1,024,000 tokens262,144 tokens
Credits provider routes313
Cheapest route$2.7852/1M$4.29385/1M
Cached input$0.02321/1M to $0.13926/1M$0.15825/1M to $0.56548/1M
Privacy posturehas ZDR routehas ZDR route
Fastest measured p50 TTFT1714 ms via baseten1263 ms via fireworks
Highest measured throughputnot enough data129 tok/s via io-net
Recent route uptime range100.00%80.00% to 100.00%
Modes chat chat

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 routes

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code routes

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison
Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython
client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code has more provider fallback routes, while DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code with the lower p50 TTFT.

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $2.7852/1M for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and $4.29385/1M for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1714 ms for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and 1263 ms for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813 and moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.

Workspace access

Sign in

Choose a sign in method to access your TrustedRouter workspace.

By signing in you agree to the terms of service and privacy policy.