OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs meta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs meta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro has more provider fallback routes, while DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

$1.37025/1MDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro cheapest route

$1.575/1Mmeta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B cheapest route

1272 msDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro fastest measured p50 TTFT via pearl

not enough datameta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B fastest measured p50 TTFT

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Prometa-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B

Model iddeepseek/deepseek-v4-prometa-models/muse-glimmer-30b

Publisher DeepSeek DeepInfra

AI IQ IQ 117#25 —

Context1,048,576 tokens131,072 tokens

Provider routes274

Cheapest route$1.37025/1M$1.575/1M

Privacy posturehas ZDR routehas ZDR route

Fastest measured p50 TTFT1272 ms via pearlnot enough data

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%not enough data

Modes chat chat

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro routes

Overview27 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

meta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B routes

Overview4 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Z.ai: GLM 5.274 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K360 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.657 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro56 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b53 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Google: Gemma 4 31B51 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Z.ai: GLM 5.151 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro47 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro or meta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B?

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro or meta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $1.37025/1M for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro and $1.575/1M for meta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro or meta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1272 ms for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro and not enough data for meta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro and meta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro and meta-models/muse-glimmer-30b. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.