OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Small

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Small: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro has more provider fallback routes, while DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show Thinking Machines: Inkling Small with the lower p50 TTFT.

$1.37025/1MDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro cheapest route

$1.575/1MThinking Machines: Inkling Small cheapest route

2342 msDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro fastest measured p50 TTFT via atlas-cloud

1679 msThinking Machines: Inkling Small fastest measured p50 TTFT via baseten

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 ProThinking Machines: Inkling Small

Model iddeepseek/deepseek-v4-prothinkingmachines/inkling-small

Publisher DeepSeek DeepInfra

AI IQ IQ 117#25 IQ 105#54

Context1,048,576 tokens524,288 tokens

Provider routes246

Cheapest route$1.37025/1M$1.575/1M

Privacy posturehas ZDR routeprovider posture varies

Fastest measured p50 TTFT2342 ms via atlas-cloud1679 ms via baseten

Highest measured throughputnot enough data158 tok/s via baseten

Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro routes

Overview24 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Thinking Machines: Inkling Small routes

Overview6 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Z.ai: GLM 5.269 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.654 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K354 combined provider routes
Thinking Machines: Inkling Small vs Z.ai: GLM 5.251 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b49 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro48 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Z.ai: GLM 5.148 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Google: Gemma 4 31B47 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro or Thinking Machines: Inkling Small?

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro or Thinking Machines: Inkling Small cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $1.37025/1M for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro and $1.575/1M for Thinking Machines: Inkling Small. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro or Thinking Machines: Inkling Small faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 2342 ms for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro and 1679 ms for Thinking Machines: Inkling Small. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro and Thinking Machines: Inkling Small with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro and thinkingmachines/inkling-small. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.