Find a model

Browse the full catalog →

Free to start

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B

Try both on us. Starter credit covers your first requests, then one key routes DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Gemma 4 31B. Switch by changing the model name.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.
Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.
Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the lower published input-plus-output rate, the larger context window and the lower measured p50 time to first token. Google: Gemma 4 31B has more Credits provider routes.

$0.1266/1MDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 cheapest route
$0.45365/1MGoogle: Gemma 4 31B cheapest route
618 msDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 fastest measured p50 TTFT via baseten
665 msGoogle: Gemma 4 31B fastest measured p50 TTFT via crusoe

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Google: Gemma 4 31B
Model iddeepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017google/gemma-4-31b-it
Context1,048,576 tokens262,144 tokens
Credits provider routes1216
Cheapest route$0.1266/1M$0.45365/1M
Cached input$0.01/1M to $0.13715/1M$0.03798/1M to $0.26375/1M
Privacy posturehas Confidential route (E2EE + ZDR)has Confidential route (E2EE + ZDR)
Fastest measured p50 TTFT618 ms via baseten665 ms via crusoe
Highest measured throughputnot enough data146 tok/s via crusoe
Recent route uptime range100.00%0.00% to 100.00%
Modes chat chat

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 routes

Google: Gemma 4 31B routes

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison
Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython
client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Google: Gemma 4 31B?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the lower published input-plus-output rate, the larger context window and the lower measured p50 time to first token. Google: Gemma 4 31B has more Credits provider routes.

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Google: Gemma 4 31B cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.1266/1M for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and $0.45365/1M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Google: Gemma 4 31B faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 618 ms for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and 665 ms for Google: Gemma 4 31B. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Google: Gemma 4 31B with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 and google/gemma-4-31b-it. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.

Workspace access

Sign in

Choose a sign in method to access your TrustedRouter workspace.

New to TrustedRouter?

By continuing you agree to the terms of service and privacy policy.