OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

google/gemini-3.1-pro vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b

google/gemini-3.1-pro vs gpt-oss-120b: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

google/gemini-3.1-pro has the larger context window. gpt-oss-120b has the lower published input-plus-output rate and more Credits provider routes. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

$14.77/1Mgoogle/gemini-3.1-pro cheapest route

$0.211/1MOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b cheapest route

not enough datagoogle/gemini-3.1-pro fastest measured p50 TTFT

799 msOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b fastest measured p50 TTFT via mancer

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

google/gemini-3.1-proOpenAI: gpt-oss-120b

Model idgoogle/gemini-3.1-proopenai/gpt-oss-120b

Publisher Google AI Studio OpenAI

AI IQ IQ 129#8 IQ 98#99

Context1,000,000 tokens131,072 tokens

Credits provider routes122

Cheapest route$14.77/1M$0.211/1M

Cached inputNot published$0.015825/1M to $0.1055/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas provider E2EE route

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data799 ms via mancer

Highest measured throughputnot enough data86 tok/s via nscale

Recent route uptime range100.00%83.60% to 100.00%

Modes chat chat

google/gemini-3.1-pro routes

Overview1 Credits routes

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b routes

Overview22 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.250 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.348 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b47 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash47 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b46 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b41 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b39 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b38 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="google/gemini-3.1-pro",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, google/gemini-3.1-pro or OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b?

Is google/gemini-3.1-pro or OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $14.77/1M for google/gemini-3.1-pro and $0.211/1M for OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is google/gemini-3.1-pro or OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for google/gemini-3.1-pro and 799 ms for OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test google/gemini-3.1-pro and OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between google/gemini-3.1-pro and openai/gpt-oss-120b. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.