OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has more provider fallback routes, while Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show Z.ai: GLM 5.2 with the lower p50 TTFT.

$4.7475/1MGoogle: Gemini 3.7 Flash cheapest route

$2.2999/1MZ.ai: GLM 5.2 cheapest route

1950 msGoogle: Gemini 3.7 Flash fastest measured p50 TTFT via google-vertex

1330 msZ.ai: GLM 5.2 fastest measured p50 TTFT via venice

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Google: Gemini 3.7 FlashZ.ai: GLM 5.2

Model idgoogle/gemini-3.7-flashz-ai/glm-5.2

Publisher Google AI Studio Z.AI

AI IQ IQ 122#18 IQ 120#20

Context1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens

Provider routes452

Cheapest route$4.7475/1M$2.2999/1M

Privacy posturehas ZDR routehas provider E2EE route

Fastest measured p50 TTFT1950 ms via google-vertex1330 ms via venice

Highest measured throughputnot enough data127 tok/s via telnyx

Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash routes

Overview4 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 routes

Overview52 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.289 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.285 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.283 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.283 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.281 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.280 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.279 combined provider routes
Z.ai: GLM 5.1 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.275 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="google/gemini-3.7-flash",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash or Z.ai: GLM 5.2?

Is Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash or Z.ai: GLM 5.2 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $4.7475/1M for Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash and $2.2999/1M for Z.ai: GLM 5.2. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash or Z.ai: GLM 5.2 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1950 ms for Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash and 1330 ms for Z.ai: GLM 5.2. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash and Z.ai: GLM 5.2 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between google/gemini-3.7-flash and z-ai/glm-5.2. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.