Find a model

Browse the full catalog →

Free to start

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Try both on us. Starter credit covers your first requests, then one key routes Gemma 4 26B A4B and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning. Switch by changing the model name.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.
Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.
Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B has more Credits provider routes. NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has the lower published input-plus-output rate and the lower measured p50 time to first token. Their context windows are the same size.

$0.41145/1MGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B cheapest route
$0.223309/1MNVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning cheapest route
1379 msGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B fastest measured p50 TTFT via nextbit-eu
841 msNVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning fastest measured p50 TTFT via io-net

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Model idgoogle/gemma-4-26b-a4b-itnvidia/nemotron-3.5-lightning
Publisher Google AI Studio NVIDIA
AI IQ IQ 99#127 —
Context262,144 tokens262,144 tokens
Credits provider routes103
Cheapest route$0.41145/1M$0.223309/1M
Cached input$0.04853/1M to $0.05275/1M$0.01055/1M to $0.03165/1M
Privacy posturehas ZDR routeprovider posture varies
Fastest measured p50 TTFT1379 ms via nextbit-eu841 ms via io-net
Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data
Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%
Modes chat decide chat

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B routes

NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning routes

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison
Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython
client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B has more Credits provider routes. NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has the lower published input-plus-output rate and the lower measured p50 time to first token. Their context windows are the same size.

Is Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.41145/1M for Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and $0.223309/1M for NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1379 ms for Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and 841 ms for NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it and nvidia/nemotron-3.5-lightning. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.

Workspace access

Sign in

Choose a sign in method to access your TrustedRouter workspace.

New to TrustedRouter?

By continuing you agree to the terms of service and privacy policy.